In a 7-1 decision, with Justice Thomas dissenting, the United States Supreme Court reversed In re Ritz, 787 F.3d 312 (5th Cir., May 22, 2015) and resoled a circuit split, with its decision in Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz, 2016 WL 2842452 (May 16, 2016). The Supreme Court held that the term "actual fraud" in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) encompasses forms of fraud, like fraudulent conveyance schemes, that can be effected without a false representation. The Court said that anything that counts as "fraud" and is done with wrongful intent is "actual fraud," although "the term is difficult to define more precisely."
top of page
Contact us (510) 763-1000
Search
Recent Posts
See AllThe 9thCircuit had previously held in In re Rosson that a debtor’s absolute right to dismiss their chapter 13 case was limited and that...
In an unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court reversed a decision of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and resolved a...
This table has the virtual meeting information and preferred procedures by Chapter 7 trustee. (Check your download folder after you click...
bottom of page